Litigation Details for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC (D. Del. 2018)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC (D. Del. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Start Trial | Date Filed | 2018-04-30 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2019-09-04 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | William C. Bryson |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Parties | RANBAXY SIGNATURE, LLC | ||
| Patents | 6,890,957 | ||
| Attorneys | Charles B. Klein | ||
| Firms | Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Details for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC (D. Del. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-30 | External link to document | |||
| 2018-04-30 | 108 | Order - -Memorandum and Order | LLC, is the sole owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,890,957 (“the ’957 patent”). Dkt. No. 1, at 3. Plaintiff …Compare ‘957 patent, claim 3 with ’957 patent, claim 4. Saptalis argues that because the patent contains…application that issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,559,187 (“the ’187 patent”). See Dkt. No. 70, at 2; Dkt. …diabetes.” ’957 patent, col. 1, ll. 15–17. Claim 1 is the only independent claim of the ’957 patent. Dkt. No…the drug protected by the ’957 patent. The agency then listed the patent in its publication entitled Approved | External link to document |
| 2018-04-30 | 149 | Judgment | not infringe any asserted claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,890,957. Thus, judgment of noninfringement is entered… counterclaim, asserting invalidity of the ’957 patent, the parties argue that the claim is moot in light… 4 September 2019 1:18-cv-00648 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
